African-American Civil Rights in the Years 1950 to 1962 Essay

formulate how far the views in inauguration B differ from those in Source A in relation to chairwo mankind Eisenhower and the integration of education.Both sources illustrate Eisenhowers negative opinion on integrating in works. Both criticise and portray Eisenhowers superstition of scurvy-spirited the break throughstanding unwashed as Source introduces Eisenhowers comment that light masses argon c at a timerned about is that their sweet lilliputian girls are non required to sit in school alongside nearly big overgrown Negroes . Eisenhowers sympathises the confederation as he originates in that location himself, the intolerance could be considered to be part of the Souths gloss and behaviour to be intolerant of the b wish bulk, it is arguable that this effected Eisenhowers semipolitical judgement .The fact that Eisenhower came from military background subsequently outgo 44 age of his life in service, would have influenced his determinations and opinions o n de requisition as military camps were segregated and Eisenhower would have been use to this system. He once again agues from the Souths point of view in Source B, I dont look at you can change the hearts of men with integritys and decisions this once again punts the point I made before. recount of his intolerance was regretting appointing Earl warren as forefront of umpire the biggest demonic phiz mistake I ever made he obviously was very against the decision and never wanted de separationism.The similarities continue as both sources shows the faltering of help the blackened people through desegregation. Source A comments that he didnt show a clear support for the compulsory address decision to desegregate schools, his silence encouraged massive resistance. His political and personal opinions were colliding with each disparate making his actions limited. Source B shows produce of his reluctance in like manner as it stated three years subsequently he fin alone y fosters the little rock 9 with a national army in 1957. This was the first time Eisenhower showed support of segregation moreover it was a derelict act from Eisenhower. It could be possible that he mat that it was his study as the president not himself supporting well-mannered rights for the black people.However, the sources do differ in the fact that source B states a more positive view on Eisenhower even thought it was considered weak. As already stated Eisenhower While in presidency did not actively support desegregation and had reservations about the cook decision, he infras overlyd his constitutional responsibility to uphold the national official authority and the law. Eisenhower ordered federal official troops to guard and Little Rock and protect black students as they walked to school. He in that respectfore became the first president since Reconstruction to use federal troops to protect the rights of African Americans. As Source As tone is very negative as it q uotes intolerant views on the African Americans, it insinuates that Eisenhower is very against African Americans being part of a innocence rescript this contrast with the little rock 9 as he support the black people into the school, after his comments it would been unlikely to help the black people but he does.To conclude source A and B are very similar as they both voice the intolerance and his lack of support Eisenhower gave to the African-Americans. I hold back with the source as from my own experience he was very against civil rights be hunting expedition of his Sothern influence. His views on desegregation was transparent from his actions and thats what source and B illustrate (12 Marks)(B) Use Source A, B and C and your own know leadge.How important was the Supreme courtroom in the development of African-American civil rights in the years 1950 to 1962?The Supreme philander is the highest federal court of law in the US, consisting of nine justices and taking judicial pr ecedence over every(prenominal) other courts in the nation. The Supreme courtyard would have benefited every African- American with their decisions of passing and lifting laws if they succeeded in winning their cases. It in allowed them to have well-grounded rights with in the terra firma and reasonedly be gibe to the white people. However, the self-esteem of the African Americans was low due to the intolerance of the white people thitherfore figures such as Rosa Parks, Martin Luther King and support of political figures such as Kennedy allowed them to be brave and a sense of pride in gaining equality. Therefore, the Supreme Court could be considered less important than other figures and factors that occurred between 1950 and 1962.Source A and B discuss the brownish vs. Topekas circuit card of learning verdict in 1954. The Supreme Court passed the law of desegregated schools by the chief of Justice Earl Warren. He was criticised for his decision such as President Eisenhowe r, who had divided his annoyance with Warren by stating that is was the biggest damn fool mistake he ever made. The silence of Eisenhowers support on desegregation caused massive resistance along with the indirect deadline for when desegregation is to commence. Hence, brownness 2 in 1955 was the attempt to get a clearer deadline than before. However, disappointingly the verdict was with all deliberate speed it was still wisplike and prolonged the wait for desegregation. The Supremes contribution in this particular situation helped civil rights as it declared more equality within America however turned to a parapet as it become a battle of when it ordain legislate.The decision also caused further problems for the African- Americans as Little Rock complied with the high courts laws and decided to desegregate there all white school. The NAACP submitted nine students in the first place to join the school and gradually bring more in and colonized them slowly. However, it wasnt th at simply as the 9 students went to enter their school they was verbally abused and tormented by the white southerners, Eisenhower had to submit federal attention to help them into school , this is stated in source B as it had taken 3 years to show any support from Eisenhower and the south to finally accept desegregation .Eisenhowers federal involvement was whence became the first president since Reconstruction to use federal troops to protect the rights of African Americans. However, since brownish vs. education Source C states that McLaurin vs. Oklahoma rules that universities too have to follow the desegregation law and that you could not provide incompatible treatment to a student solely because of his/her race. This proves that the Supreme Court was furthering African American rights through all levels of education making them equal and educated. This is another influence the Supreme Court had over monolithic changes for the African Americans and the society around them.How ever, it is arguable that the Supreme Court only assist the figures and events that immensely changed civil rights for the African Americans. Events such as the Montgomery stack boycott in 1956 were a political and social differ. after the check into of Rosa parks African Americans were ready to take action and find oneself rough equality and raise the issue of how wrong it is to launch a tired, old lady to move, even if it wasnt entirely true. The boycott was led by the group the MIA (Montgomery Improvement Association) Satur solar day 3rd December the black partnership supported each other as a plentitude of people avoided the busses and had to take rides with other people in the community, even though it was unwieldy the supporters of the cause enthusiastically agreed to continue the boycott until there was justice.The triumph of the black people boycotting led to economic stress were the issue of segregation would be over. The fact that one event, encourage African Am ericans to stand for their rights influenced and uncovered the most influential figures in civil right hi score and gained justice from their efforts. This is repeated again the 1960 in the Greensboro sit-ins when African Americans worsen to move to from their seats in the Woolworths store. Their numbers increased in support and was watched by the world even Eisenhower voiced his opinions on the matter. These nonviolent protests allowed black people to become a part of changing their future and not relying on court cases and individuals to get them there.Arguably even though they gained great success the black people didnt have any legal hold on desegregating the bus system, thus the Browder vs. Gayle case. The Supreme Court upheld the order courts decision in making buss desegregated. Without the confirmation from the Supreme Court all the black peoples efforts would have resulted to nothing without the confirmation of the Supreme Court. Rosa parks is seen in our modern-day day history as an inspirational civil rights leader. Her story influenced thousands of African Americans to boycott buses and gain equality.However, her image of being a sound working, old, fragile women who wanted to rest her feet after a long day isnt true at all. She had been an active protester and NAACP member for years and probably planned this protest to gain publicity and change. Due to her protest Martin Luther King was noticed as a civil rights figure, he had been watched from all over the world and from and so on seen as the leading civil rights leader. His efforts in the SCLC created in 1957 after the Montgomery bus boycott, helped the southern African Americans who suffered from great intolerance .However, once again their efforts amounted to achieving the legalisation of equality, without the Supreme Court all their efforts went to nothing. To conclude even though Martin Luther King is seen as the deliverer of the African Americans in gaining equality and is still admire d in our modern day society, it is the supreme court that allowed them legally to be treated as equals and live the lives they should live. However, without the efforts and protests the Supreme Court would never have considered to pass or all the African Americans to have the equality they gained through their efforts. Therefore, the other factors that influenced African Americans development on civil rights were more important than the Supreme Court.(2A) develop why school were not nimblely desegregated after the verdict in the Brown vs. Topeka Board of procreation case of 1954 * Earl Warren passed desegregation in 1954 in the Brown vs. Topeka Board of education. This was to end segregation. The NAACP plant Thurgood to take the case and won with Earl Warrens confirmation However, Warren didnt set the deadline when schools should be desegregated. This prolonged desegregation and led to the court case Brown 2 in 1955 to gain directness on when desegregation will commence .However the verdict remained vague commenting that desegregation should happen with all deliberate speed allowing desegregation, once again to be prevented from racial diversity in schools. This suggests that the Supreme Court was reluctant to desegregate schools richly due to Eisenhowers silence and the Souths reluctance to do so.Other than the Cooper vs. Aaron case, the southern pronunciamento is proof of their reluctance as this was a legal document signed by 99 politicians to restitution the decision on Brown vs. Education, because of the legality and not just the opinions of the south. This then makes the manifesto more than reluctance but a serious legal matter. Their claim matched the opinions of the south commenting that segregation in public schools was unconstitutional. The southern manifesto stated that It is destroying the amicable relations between the white and Negro races, It has plant hatred and suspicion where there has been heretofore friendship and understanding to m ake their argument fair and agreeable they used the humor that desegregation will bring violence and issues to the communities when there is no need.Even though some theaters (especially in the pairing where it was more tolerant) accepted desegregation quickly. However, a lot of the south continued segregation as they didnt agree with the Brown vs. Board of Education, thus the southern manifesto. The build-up of tension of intolerance was at little rock. Little rock school in Arkansas decided to keep up with the high courts ruling. The NAACP submitted 9 students to the previously all white school. They was verbally abused and tormented as they entered the school, President Eisenhower had to send federal troops to protect the 9 children. This suggests that fear that was presented in the southern manifesto was proven to be true allowing anxiety for other schools and black people to comply with desegregation.President Eisenhower originated from the south and voiced intolerance hims elf about the decisions of Brown vs. board of education. It was commented that his silence encouraged massive resistance to applying the new(a) law forcefully through the country as he did not agree with the verdict. It was also claimed that he voiced annoyance about appointing Earl Warren stating that it was The biggest damn fool mistake I ever made this is evidence of his intolerance because he disapproved of Warrens decision. Being a military man himself he was use to the segregation system and probably agreed with the idea of separate but equal. This suggests why the Supreme Court had abandoned vague answers of when the deadline should be on desegregation because the president wasnt knowing with the decision.To conclude there were many factors to why desegregation wasnt immediate however the most important factor that contributed to preventing desegregation was the south. The fear, the legal documentation created by the south, the behaviour and the powerful leaders from the south made the desegregation difficult and tense. The Souths intolerance caused the most issues, as the north complied with high courts decision quickly as there was less intolerance. * (2B) The work of the National Association for the progression of Coloured pile (NAACP) was the most important reason for the desegregation of schools in the years 1950 to 1960 * Explain why you agree or disagree with this view* The NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Coloured People) is an African-American civil rights organization in the United States, organize in 1909. Their mission is to ensure the political, educational, social, and economic equality of rights of all persons and to pooh-pooh racial hatred and racial discrimination. They are the earliest organisation to care African- Americans into equality. They have had many successes in desegregating schools and their efforts have gone far however, it is arguable that other organisations, figures and events that were more in fluential to desegregation in schools than the NAACP. * The NAACP had succeeded in other cases for the rights of black people however it was the Brown vs. Board of Education that is considered NAACPs victorious achievement. But, without the work of Thurgood marshal that was appointed by the NAACP the outcome cogency have been different.Other than being the first African American to act on the Supreme Court he had won 29 out of the 32 he had faced. He was a very intelligent and stood for his rights after winning previous cases for the NAACP himself and a team of NAACP attorneys won Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka. Other than the NAACP winning the case Thurgood who was part of the NAACP team, was an inspiration to the African Americans. However, the decision didnt lead to an immediate change as there was no clear deadline. The NAACP and Marshall forgot to argue its urgency for change therefore, Brown 2 the case that was to get the urgency it needed however, the decision was va gue as it stated with deliberate speed. The NAACP did succeed in the decision of desegregation but it had no action. NAACP helped all African Americans in need such as the Little Rock 9 in 1957. The NAACP submitted 9 students to attend the previously all white school Little Rock, this was an achievement as a lot of the south wasnt and would not comply with the high courts orders.However, this turned into a disadvantage as The 9 students was verbally abused, tormented and prevented to enter their new school. The NAACP however, did help them try and enter or submit them in different and safer schools. It wasnt just Little Rock students that they helped enter schools but many.* It is arguable that other factors effected the desegregation of schools such as the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court had to pass the laws to gain legal equality, therefore the Brown vs. Education case without the Chief of Justice Earl Warren reaching the decision that segregation is unconstitutional. Desegregati on would never have gone through. They pass the McLaurin vs. Oklahoma state regents, this was to desegregate universities. However, other cases were inspired by the efforts of the NAACP, and the outcome they reached in the Brown vs. board of Education Verdict.* However, it was the ordinary people that changed their future by joining protests and helping each other. Such as Linda Brown, if it wasnt for Lindas cause the case to bring desegregation to schools. Linda Brown was the Daughter to Oliver Brown, because of his annoyance that his lady friend had to walk 6 blocks because of the Plessy vs. Ferguson ruling separate but equal under the Jim Crow laws. Her long walks to school led to one of the most monumental events that happened for African Americans.However, Linda Brown was part one of the thirteen families that was recruited to Topeka (the area they lived in), the NAACP took the case for Brown and pursued his plan to desegregate schools. * To conclude The NAACP efforts in deseg regating schools were more important than the other factors that influenced desegregations. Without The NAACP providing lawyers such as Marshall and helping brown win his case, Oliver brown wouldnt of won the case. I believe that the NAACPs involvement in the desegregation of schools was the main reason and thats why I agree with the statement.